The Campaign
This is how a verified election actually spreads — not by mandate from Washington, but one willing community at a time, proving it works and letting the next one decide for itself.
Trust is not announced. It is demonstrated, then copied.
No one is asked to take this system on faith, and no one is asked to adopt it all at once. The plan spreads the same way any real change in American election administration has ever spread: by proof, by authority that already exists, and by one good result making the next decision easier.
Proof beats argument
A result a citizen can check for themselves ends a fight that no assurance from an official ever could. This campaign leads with something to verify, not something to believe.
Authority sits locally
States and local jurisdictions run elections in this country. That is not a limitation on this plan — it is where adoption has to happen, because it is where the decision actually lives.
Confidence compounds
Every published, checkable result is evidence the next jurisdiction can point to. Adoption gets easier with each step, not because of pressure, but because of a growing record.
Five rungs. Every one of them voluntary.
Each rung is a real step up in stakes — and at every rung, the decision to climb belongs entirely to the people already responsible for that vote.
-
1
An organization votes its own election
A union, an association, a board, a caucus — any group that already controls its own roll and its own rules runs its own internal election this way. It is binding for that vote because the organization itself decided so.
Who decides: the organization, for itself -
2
A municipality runs it in parallel
A city or town runs a verified count alongside its official election — non-binding, and the paper ballot still governs the certified result. The risk to that certified count is none; the point is to let officials and residents see the system work on a real local election.
Who decides: the municipality -
3
A state pilot program
A state runs a formal pilot across whichever counties choose to take part, with scope, safeguards, and review set by that state's own process.
Who decides: the state, county by willing county -
4
States adopt in statute
A state writes the system into its own election law, on its own terms and its own timetable, the way it would adopt any other change to how it runs its elections.
Who decides: the state legislature -
5
The federal role: enable, never mandate
The federal government's part is to set open standards, fund the effort, publish a model law states can borrow from, and offer one optional shared, privacy-protected verification tool that states may choose to use — or may not. It does not run an election, require a state to adopt anything, or take over any jurisdiction's count. Every rung above this one is a choice made closer to home, and this rung is built to keep it that way.
Who decides: nothing is decided here — states still choose
Concrete, modest, and next.
No one is asked to commit to the whole plan today. Each actor has one real next step.
Election officials
- Read the strategy and the one-pager.
- Watch the short explainer video.
- Ask what a non-binding parallel run would take in your own jurisdiction.
Legislators & staff
- Read the model-law approach in the full strategy.
- Ask your state's election office what a pilot would require.
- Share the one-pager with colleagues on relevant committees.
Organizations & associations
- Consider running your own internal election this way first.
- Bring the one-pager to your board.
- Ask what verification would take for a vote you already control.
Citizens
- Read it. Watch it.
- Hand the one-pager to someone who runs an election near you.
- Ask your own clerk what verification would take.
Say it plainly. This is the site's credibility.
What we are asking for
- Open standards that any jurisdiction can read, adopt, or reject.
- Published, checkable results — a count anyone can verify, not one they are asked to trust.
- A paper record alongside the verified count, every time.
- Eligibility resolved person to person, with a real chance to answer.
- Every access path funded — video, in-person, and assisted verification alike.
What we are not asking for
- No federal takeover of elections. States and local jurisdictions keep the authority they already have.
- No mandatory national system. Adoption is a choice made at each rung of the ladder, never a requirement.
- No voter purges by list-matching. No automated match ever deletes a name.
- No identity-to-ballot registry. The system is built so nothing links a voter to how they voted.
- No one excluded for lacking a device. In-person and assisted paths are always open.
The hard questions, without spin.
Isn't internet voting unsafe?
A verified election still keeps the paper record as the governing count — that is not a placeholder, it is the safeguard. Verifiability is the point: instead of asking anyone to trust a machine, the system is built so the result can be checked. That said, a compromised voter device is a named residual risk in this plan, not a solved one, and it deserves to be treated that way rather than waved off.
Does this create a national voter database?
No. The system stores one fact per voter — eligible, yes or no. No table anywhere links a voter's identity to their ballot; that link is destroyed by the design itself, not merely by policy.
Will this be used to purge voters?
No. No automated match — against a death record, a felony record, a citizenship record, or any other list — ever deletes a name on its own. Genuine eligibility questions are settled person to person, with a real chance to answer, before anything changes.
Who decides whether verification is required?
Legislatures and the courts — not this plan. This campaign describes a system and a path to try it; it does not assert that any jurisdiction is required to adopt it, and it makes no claim about what the law currently requires anywhere.
Three ways in. Pick the one that fits.
None of these collect anything from you. The email link simply opens your own mail program — there is no form, no mailing list, and nothing is stored.
Watch the live demo
Cast & Verify is the working demonstration behind this plan — try the process yourself and see what a checkable result actually looks like.
Ask about your jurisdiction or organization
Considering a parallel run, a pilot, or a vote your own organization controls? Send a note and start the conversation.
Hand someone the files
The full strategy and the one-page summary are built to be forwarded, printed, and handed to the person who actually runs an election near you.
One citizen. One verified vote. A result the whole nation can trust — and not one eligible American left behind.